<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0, 3.0, 4.0&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/web-20-30-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/web-20-30-40/</link>
	<description>Latest news and online thoughts of Graphic Designers Attitude Design</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ë˜ time design &#187; web 2.0 oder web 2.0 Ë˜</title>
		<link>http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/web-20-30-40/comment-page-1/#comment-12204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ë˜ time design &#187; web 2.0 oder web 2.0 Ë˜</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/journal/?p=191#comment-12204</guid>
		<description>[...] web 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] web 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Teskey</title>
		<link>http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/web-20-30-40/comment-page-1/#comment-7536</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Teskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/journal/?p=191#comment-7536</guid>
		<description>Nice article Matt. It's nice to see that some people recognize the difference between the technology "Web 2.0", and the style of "Web 2.0". It's funny to see how very few people actually realize that the style was a follow up of the function.

Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Matt. It&#8217;s nice to see that some people recognize the difference between the technology &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;, and the style of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;. It&#8217;s funny to see how very few people actually realize that the style was a follow up of the function.</p>
<p>Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
