<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calls To Action - Click Here!</title>
	<link>http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/calls-to-action-click-here/</link>
	<description>Latest news and online thoughts of Graphic Designers Attitude Design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/calls-to-action-click-here/#comment-32449</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.attitudedesign.co.uk/calls-to-action-click-here/#comment-32449</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I buy your rationale that 'click here' is good to use because of those cases. You'd find tons more that didn't use it.

Clicking is the default behaviour that everyone knows on the web, so I think I'll wait until I see more evidence that it's an effective CTA before using it.

While banners might be debatable, It certainly shouldn't be used as in-line link text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I buy your rationale that &#8216;click here&#8217; is good to use because of those cases. You&#8217;d find tons more that didn&#8217;t use it.</p>
<p>Clicking is the default behaviour that everyone knows on the web, so I think I&#8217;ll wait until I see more evidence that it&#8217;s an effective CTA before using it.</p>
<p>While banners might be debatable, It certainly shouldn&#8217;t be used as in-line link text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
